The Low-carb Fraud

The Low-carb Fraud

eBook - 2014
Average Rating:
Rate this:
Baker & Taylor
Argues that low-carbohydrate diets are incorrect in their demonization of all carbohydrates and provides an optimal human diet for ideal weight, vibrant health, and longevity.

Perseus Publishing
By now, the low-carb diet’s refrain is a familiar one:

Bread is bad for you. Fat doesn’t matter. Carbs are the real reason you can’t lose weight.

The low-carb universe Dr. Atkins brought into being continues to expand. Low-carb diets, from South Beach to the Zone and beyond, are still the go-to method for weight-loss for millions. These diets’ marketing may differ, but they all share two crucial components: the condemnation of “carbs” and an emphasis on meat and fat for calories. Even the latest diet trend, the Paleo diet, is—despite its increased focus on (some) whole foods—just another variation on the same carbohydrate fears.

In The Low-Carb Fraud, longtime leader in the nutritional science field T. Colin Campbell (author of The China Study and Whole) outlines where (and how) the low-carb proponents get it wrong: where the belief that carbohydrates are bad came from, and why it persists despite all the evidence to the contrary. The foods we misleadingly refer to as “carbs” aren’t all created equal—and treating them that way has major consequences for our nutritional well-being.

If you’re considering a low-carb diet, read this e-book first. It will change the way you think about what you eat—and how you should be eating, to lose weight and optimize your health, now and for the long term.

Publisher: Dallas, Texas : BenBella Books, Inc., [2014]
ISBN: 9781940363035
Branch Call Number: eBook
Characteristics: 1 online resource
text file
Additional Contributors: Jacobson, Howard 1930-
OverDrive, Inc


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment
Jun 20, 2019

Yet another book written to validate vegetarianism. If you are a vegetarian and don’t want to eat Bambi or Thumper this is your book. However, if you’re looking for well researched, compelling arguments with a science basis don’t waste your time with this blatant advertorial for vegetarianism. He spends 7 pages patting himself on the back, 4 pages promoting his book The China Study and eight pages promoting his new book “Whole”. That’s 19 pages out of a total of 70 pages!!! Wow! In addition to the seemingly endless references The China Study, (his first book). He then has the nerve to claim he has nothing to gain from promoting his books. This basically a promotional brochure for Campbell’s books. I’m surprised it didn’t include tickets or coupons for his latest course or book. That’s 40 minutes I’ll never get back.

Jan 25, 2018

Excellent deconstruction of Gary Taubes work here in the first half. In the second half he applies his sharp intellect and vast experience to Paleo. Well written. Quick read -- done in one night.

Jan 22, 2018

T Colin Campbell is a modern day hero. He grew up farming animals and went into research to help end food insecurity by helping to maximize production of animal protein. He rose to the highest levels in academia and science, but as he learned more and dug deeper he discovered that the data did not support what he had grown up believing, what he had been taught in his prestigious education and what was supported by government policy.
So he did the only thing an ethical scientist can do.
He told the truth.
The smear campaign, and unfounded, oft-repeated lie (by those unwilling to give up animal protein) that his work has been discredited, is evidence of just how credible Campbell and his work really are.

Jul 28, 2017

People with a vegetarian agenda can be spotted by watching for three things, an argument based on – religion, global warming, or animal cruelty. Campbell doesn’t really do these. He was raised on a farm eating a traditional American diet. It was his practice and research as an MD that changed his mind.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. His earlier work has not been debunked so much as slandered and misrepresented, as he explains clearly if you can be bothered to read this very short book.
I’m sure Campbell would agree with me: if you want to eat a bunch of bacon and pay someone to tell you it’s good for you, rock on; it’s a semi-free country.

LRS1969 Mar 30, 2015

88 page book from a dedicated vegetarian whose works have always been biased by his dietary ideology.

Extremely fictitious "data" taken out of context, biased interpretations, and often so my made up!

Mar 07, 2015

The author's book The China Study has been discredited because he used selective data and this book also has misleading information.
He repeatedly insists that low carb means high protein and little veges or fruit. I have read many books about Paleo and low carb and they all suggest moderate protein and fruit and a lot of veges. Campbell is scathing about the findings of professional researchers at respected universities because they do not tally with his own views. He quotes Cordain contemptuously but avoids Cordain saying that low carb is variable and may be up to 40% carbs. The man is, apparently, a vegan and imo cannot see past his own ideology. Tens of thousands of personal testimonies on low carb forums prove this way of eating to be beneficial in every way.

Mar 06, 2015

An excellent short presentation of critiques of the most common low-carb diets now being promoted. There's so much conflicting input/noise about nutrition in circulation right now, that's it takes a serious reading project with determined study to figure out what to believe. Campbell's summary makes this easier by being specific and brief.
I'm a professional statistician who worked most of my career in research design and data analysis. I've spent a lot of time reviewing and cross-checking the claims of incorrect data usage by Campbell. I find no basis for the claim that Campbell has been “discredited”.
Claims of flawed data use by Campbell seem to derive ultimately from blog posts by Denise Minger. At the time, Minger was perhaps 23, had studied English Literature, and had no experience in research or statistical analysis. I find her criticisms of Campbell's China Study analysis to contain fundamental conceptual flaws. During critiques of other nutritional writers, she has sometimes made really basic data handling errors... getting columns in a table lined up incorrectly before generating graphs, etc. And then she offers sharp and sarcastic rebukes based on her erroneous graphical results. This is not trustworthy statistical criticism.
Because of the workings of the blogosphere, Minger's critiques got widespread attention among groups hostile to vegetarian diets. But wide coverage doesn't mean that her critique was correct.
Regarding charges that Campbell doesn't respect professional researchers... Campbell IS a professional researcher, and it's his professional duty to speak his understanding even if it differs from that of other professionals. It would make little sense to constrain professional researchers to never disagree with other researchers.
The charge that Campbell's interpretations can't be trusted because he is a vegan mix up cause and effect. Campbell started as a mid-west, meat-eating farm boy. His research was NOT driven to it's conclusions by previously established diet preferences. The situation instead was that his diet changes were driven by his changed understanding of nutrition. Campbell is acting like he personally believes his recommendations, and that seems ethical and proper.
I looked up several of the research papers Campbell references. In every case I found his representations to be accurate.
I've found NO long term studies that document improvement in overall medical health from following diets such as the Paleo. The typical focus is instead primarily or only on short-term weight loss results, which isn't the same. Ornish and Esselstyn, by contrast have both obtained clear physical documentation of reversals of severe cardiac problems with a low-fat, plant based diet. I've seen no research documenting similar strong results with diets like Paleo and Atkins.
Regarding Campbell's statements that low carb diets are typically high protein diets... Loren Cordain in his book (The Paleo Diet) indicates that you should eat as much protein as you want. He says that if you eat too much, you'll get sick from protein toxicity, and that is OK... just readjust your protein intake downwards naturally after you get sick. Cordain states that protein toxicity occurs when protein intake reaches about 35% of calorie intake. Example diets in his book contain over 30% of calories from protein. A diet that recommends eating protein to the maximum that doesn't actually make you sick is literally about as “high protein” as you can get.


Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number


Subject Headings


Find it at IndyPL

To Top